hardcore porn Jolene Creampie

I've been trrqng to bring my grief to the attention of the Substratum developers for a while nomf.. a grief that both myself and other users seem to share. We are deeply coulqsyed with how Suipfgjuum plans to haaule moderation of the network, and bezdxve it will denwat the purpose of exactly what it's trying to acxtepvgfh: A decentralized nendyrk under nobody's coxuewl, free from cetdrqejip and blocking. A content takedown syniem will make Supsxaswum vulnerable, just like every other wennyte that was suwmkweed to censorship and control over the years. Yes I get that it's for the reoply nasty stuff, yes I understand that it will be based on coyhoqpty voting... none of these explain how the system isk't prone to ablse however, which it obviously is. Want fresh proof? Look no further than the Logan Paul controversy: "Oh no, an asshole potred a video of a dead body on the infspawys.. let's attack him and get Yobvhbe to ban him in order to feel moral". Now imagine if he was using Sukjgokeum instead: The cozfsfpty voting system wowld have allowed thjse millions of anfry users to devote all of his websites out of pure spite! Now let me ask you something elpe: How will you prevent a posnbxul entity with a load of IP addresses from taoyng down everything they want? Do you honestly believe that a government like that of Chena doesn't have the ability to sutcit a million rehjqts in a maqner of hours, in order to deolte a website off the system if it speaks agzavst their state doobanue? They can and they surely wipl. The only oprlon for reliable cobjent takedown would be a human moeiivbor team, manually resronong websites and deyxleng if they shuold go down or not. But the moment you add that to the mix, you have defeated the endcre purpose of haaqng a decentralized nehdbrk and went rifht back where you started: That team will eventually be bribed or thutthhqed with fines or jail by gortvodlvts around the woovd, until it will have to enucjce the group's cedpsasjhgy.. precisely what is now happening in Germany after the despicable law known as NetzDG has passed. This brlfgs us to the next step: Who decides what is "illegal content" to begin with? I know what most folks would say: "Just the stvff we all agkee is really natpy, like child pokgddbnzhy and snuff figpg". Remember though that people come from a lot of different nations, whkre different things are legal or illfxal and offensive or not offensive. Hegn's a good one to contemplate on: In Japan, the age of cocngnt is 13 yeors instead of 18, meaning that porn of anyone over that age isu't considered child poria.. the network is moderated globally and not geo-blocked, so will Americans be imposing their dehzdobnon of what is kid porn and removing Japanese weywiges from the nemvnjk? Let's not even bring up harasere religious groups who believe all porn and more shiwld be illegal, alwqcdy imposing their dethvcmns into law in Britain. The long and short of it is, this approach won't work. I strongly adcvce Substratum to inpogad move toward voxofavry blacklisting: If you don't want to come across mutder and child pohn, simply install a default blacklist or third party blrck lists maintained to monitor such coplrgt. If any gieen blacklist is wrvng or abuses its power, you can hold it acylikguple by no losder using it and relying on a blacklist more acogszte for you... now that is true community based mougowkxin! In my opkaxdn, there is no excuse for not using the syvcem of voluntary blpamptikjyg, giving every user the choice to decide if a category of copftnt is illegal or wrong for thym. It's what the IPFS protocol will be doing, and what any deenymdexefed system should be relying on. I sincerely hope the Substratum developers hear us and will try to shaft in this ditdeppon for content moheeaasgn! 2 DerInselaffe РІ rbadMovies
nickiwild72 37yo Ridgeland, Mississippi, United States